Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 16-20

Bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern in Intensive Care Units of the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria


1 Department of Medical Laboratory Science, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria
2 Department of Medical Laboratory Services, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, FCT Abuja, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication7-Jun-2017

Correspondence Address:
Idris Abdullahi Nasir
Department of Medical Laboratory Services, University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, FCT Abuja
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2276-7096.207587

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background: Nosocomial infections are among leading causes of morbidity and mortality and are associated with increased antibiotic resistance in Intensive Care Units (ICUs). This prospective study was conducted between March and October 2014 in the ICUs of the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital to assess the rate, types, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of airborne and surface-borne bacterial contamination before and after fumigation.
Materials and Methods: Sixty samples were collected and investigated from fomites by surface swabbing and open plate air exposure in the ICUs before and after fumigation using standard microbiological methods.
Results: Out of the sixty samples investigated, 38 (63.3%) yielded positive bacterial growth. Twenty-six (68%) were before fumigation of the ICU and 31.5% (n = 12) from postfumigation culture. Coagulase-negative Staphylococci spp.(CoNS) accounted for 39.4% (n = 15) of the positive cultures, Bacillus spp. 15% (n = 9), Klebsiella pneumoniae 13.2% (n = 5), Escherichia coli 10.5% (n = 4), Klebsiella oxytoca 7.9% (n = 3), and Streptococcus pyogenes 5.3% (n = 2). The antibiotic susceptibility test results of the isolates revealed that CoNS were resistant to amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, and cefuroxime. K. pneumoniae was also resistance to chloramphenicol, aminoglycosides, and penicillins, whereas E. coli showed resistance to fluoroquinolones, particularly pefloxacin and ofloxacin. Conversely, Bacillus spp., K. oxytoca, and S. pyogenes were susceptibility to all test antibiotics.
Conclusion: The high level of bacterial contamination of equipment and inanimate objects in the ICUs and the presence of multidrug resistant bacteria calls for prompt and a holistic infection control interventions.

Keywords: Bacterial contamination, fomites, Intensive Care Unit, nosocomial infection


How to cite this article:
Barma MM, Nasir IA, Babayo A. Bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern in Intensive Care Units of the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. J Med Trop 2017;19:16-20

How to cite this URL:
Barma MM, Nasir IA, Babayo A. Bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern in Intensive Care Units of the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Nigeria. J Med Trop [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Dec 15];19:16-20. Available from: http://www.jmedtropics.org/text.asp?2017/19/1/16/207587




  Introduction Top


Patients in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are a significant subgroup of all hospitalized patients, accounting for about 25% of all hospital infections.[1] The prevalence of ICU-acquired infections is significantly higher in developing countries than in industrialized countries, varying between 4.4% and 88.9%.[2] Furthermore, device-associated infection rates in developing countries, especially ventilator-associated pneumonia followed by central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections occur at a higher frequency than in European countries and the USA.[3]

There has been a recent interest in the use of chemical fumigation in health-care facilities because of concerns about the role of the environment as a cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and a perception that surface cleaning and disinfection methods are ineffective.[4]

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other Gram-positive bacteria have become an increasingly common problem in health-care environments.[5] A more recent concern is the upswing in the incidence of infections caused by Clostridium difficile.[6] This organism is now considered to be the most important cause of diarrheal HAI.[7]Acinetobacter baumannii is yet another microorganism involved in HAIs that has been linked to environmental contamination. Of course, for each infectious agent, there are a variety of potential pathways of exposure and different routes of exposure. It is commonly assumed that the most important risk factor for HAI is direct contact spread (principally via caregiver's hands).[4],[7]

Researchers have explored using chlorine dioxide, hydrogen peroxide vapor (HPV), super-oxidized water, or ozone for terminal disinfection of hospitals contaminated with mold and bacteria.[8] In the past, paraformaldehyde has been used to decontaminate biological safety cabinets and entire buildings. Fumigants such as chlorine dioxide and HPV are two agents most frequently examined to decontaminate hospitals, animal research facilities, or similar environments.[4],[8]

Fumigants are being considered as an adjunct to conventional environmental disinfection due to their composition as a gas or vapor, allowing them to easily penetrate hard to reach areas.[8] Although many of these fumigants will kill microorganisms, there are still concerns for the safety of patients and workers who may be inadvertently exposed to these toxicants.

Boyce et al. conducted a before-after intervention study of the effectiveness of HPV in the control of C. difficile.[9] During the intervention period, rooms that had previously housed C. difficile patients were fumigated using the Bioquell system. Each room took approximately 3–4 h to disinfect. The average incidence rates of C. difficile infection dropped from 2.28 per 1000 patient days during the preintervention phase to 1.28 (P = 0.047) during the intervention phase. Andersen et al. used the Sterinis system (Gloster Stante Europe, Toulouse, France) to generate a 30–60 ppm concentration of hydrogen peroxide as a “dry fume.”[10] This process involved closing the room door but not sealing the room, and the cycle time was reported to be 4–5 h. They used spore strips containing 2.5 × 106 spores of Bacillus atrophaeus as the test agent, and the results were reported as pass-fail. There was a 100% spore inactivation in the 48 surgical suite tests and an 87% inactivation (127 of 148 spore strips) in the other rooms tested.[10]

Bacteria are also transmitted between ICU patients by respiratory droplets (from infected airway secretions) and via other inanimate objects or fomites in the ICU environment.[11],[12] About 20% of ICU patients will develop nosocomial infections, often caused by resistant bacteria and many more become colonized by resistant bacteria.[13],[14]

In the ICUs, sanitation protocols are stricter than in other areas of the hospital, yet many patients treated are infected with nosocomial superbugs, often due to an underlying severe disease conditions. These nosocomial infections remain among the leading causes of death in hospitals of most countries. For example, they are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the USA; 1.7 million infections resulting in 99,000 deaths were reported in 2002.[14]

A study carried out in Jos, Nigeria, estimated the prevalence of nosocomial infection in the ICU as 6.0%, and a disproportionate 20% occur in critically ill patients. The study also determined the contributory role of fomites in the spread of nosocomial infections. Overall 69 (99%) cultures yielded growth; S. aureus (44.3%), coagulase negative Staphylococci (CoNS) (74.3%), and Bacillus spp. (90.0%). Out of the S. aureus isolated, 7 (22.6%) were MRSA. These were isolates from fan switches, X-ray viewing boxes, dwarf partition walls, ventilators, tables, floors, and hand towels.[15]

The distribution of bacterial pathogens in the ICU in another study conducted by Okon et al. in Maiduguri Teaching Hospital reported 38.4% cases of nosocomial bacteria among study sites that included the operating theater, the ICU, Special Care Baby Unit, dialysis center, and the Central Sterile Service Department. Out of the 267 samples collected and analysed, 70.0% (n = 186) were positive for bacterial growth; 72.1% CoNS, Proteus spp. (8.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.8%), and coliforms (2.2%).[16]

In view of the contributory role of the ICU environment to infection transmission, we conducted this study to determine the rate, types, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of airborne and surface-borne bacterial contaminants before and after fumigation at the University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital (UMTH).


  Materials and Methods Top


Study area

The study was conducted between March to October 2014 in ICUs of the UMTH, Maiduguri. The ICUs are multidisciplinary and care for all critically ill patients. Maiduguri, the capital city of Borno State, Nigeria, located in Northeast Nigeria shares borders with neighboring countries such as Niger Republic, Chad, and Cameroon. Within Nigeria, Maiduguri shares borders with other States such as Adamawa, Yobe, and Gombe and has Sahel savannah vegetation. The annual average temperature of Maiduguri ranges from 19.1°C to 34.7°C and average annual precipitation is 562 mm.

Sampling

Sixty samples from the ICU work environment were purposively collected. These included open-plate air exposure culture and fomites swabbing (door handles, table surfaces, gowns, machines/equipment uses, and windows/walls). Forty-five samples were collected before fumigation (prefumigation culture) of the ICU, and 15 samples were collected after fumigation (postfumigation). Based on available information from the ICUs managerial staff, fumigation was last conducted on January 19, 2014, before sampling. Subsequently, post fumigation sampling was conducted 24 h of fumigation.

Methods

Labeled sterile swab sticks moistened with sterile physiological saline were used to swab the fomites in the ICU until the swabs were visibly dirty. All samples collected were transported immediately to the microbiology laboratory where they were inoculated in pairs onto dried blood agar and MacConkey agar plates. Open-plate air exposure was also done with blood agar and MacConkey agar plates. Plates were both aerobically and anaerobically incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Bacteria were identified using standard microbiological methods as described by Cowman and Steel [17] and Lenette et al.[18] while the antibiotic susceptibility pattern was determined using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method.[19]

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethical research committee of the UMTH, Maiduguri, Nigeria.


  Results Top


Out of the sixty samples collected, 63.3% (n = 38) yielded positive bacterial growth. About 68% (n = 26) before fumigation of the ICU and 31.5% (n = 12) from post fumigation culture, whereas 36.6% (n = 22) yielded no bacterial growth [Table 1]. Fifteen distinct isolates of CoNS spp. from fomites and open-plate air exposure accounted for 39.4% (n = 15) of the positive cultures, followed by Bacillus spp. Fifteen percent (n = 9, respectively, predominating the positive cultures being isolates from both prefumigation and postfumigation cultures. Klebsiella pneumoniae accounted for about 13.2% (n = 5), Escherichia coli 10.5% (n = 4), Klebsiella oxytoca 7.9% (n = 3), and Streptococcus pyogenes 5.3% (n = 2).
Table 1: Frequency distribution of isolates from fomites and open plate cultures

Click here to view


The frequency distribution of isolated bacterial according to the site of sampling showed 8 (21.1%) were from air exposure of the ICU by open plate method. The other fomites contaminants isolated by swabbing method included 12 (31.5%) from bed surfaces, 9 (23.7%) from ICU equipment/machines, 5 (13.2%) from table surfaces, 2 (5.3%) from windows and walls of the ICU, and 1 (2.6%) organism each from door handles and gowns accounting for the least number of bacterial isolates [Table 2].
Table 2: Frequency distribution of fomites surface and airborne contaminants isolated from Intensive Care Units

Click here to view


The antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the bacterial isolates revealed that CoNS was most resistant to amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, and cefuroxime. K. pneumonia e was resistant to chloramphenicol, all aminoglycosides, and penicillins used, whereas E. coli was resistance to pefloxacin and ofloxacin. Conversely, Bacillus spp., K. oxytoca, and S. pyogenes isolated was susceptibility to all test antibiotics [Table 3].
Table 3: Antibiogram profile of bacterial isolates from fomites and open plate cultures

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This study has shown a high prevalence of the ICU environment in Maiduguri. Although the prevalence reduced postfumigation, contamination was not completely eliminated. The isolated bacteria were CoNS and Bacillus spps. The highest contamination involved bed surfaces and equipment and contamination was particularly with CoNS (39.4%). There were also multidrug resistant isolates such as K. Oxytoca, E. coli, and S. pyogenes which were resistant to co-trimoxazole, amoxicillin, and augmentin.

The frequency of CoNS is in conformity with the previous study which reported CoNS as the major causative agents of nosocomial infections in the ICU particularly.[20],[21] CoNS infections are associated with increased morbidity particularly neonatal sepsis and neurodevelopmental impairment.[20],[21],[22]

The frequency of ICU bacteria contamination reported from this study (63.3%) is higher than those previously by Hassan et al.[23] The differences may be due to disparity in study location sample size and hygienic conditions of the study area. Airborne contamination rate of 21% (n = 8) obtained from both prefumigation and postfumigation open plate cultures gave the bacteriological status of air circulating within the ICU and reliability of chemicals used for disinfection and fumigation. This value was relatively higher to the 14.1% contamination rate reported by Okon et al.[16]

The isolation of pathogens from equipment and other fomites indicates that they could be a source of infection to ICU patients. Previous data provided that the ICU is regularly disinfected on daily basis despite the relative presence of these isolates recorded. The source and possible cause of contaminant include normal skin flora of medical personnel, patients, and invasive device and equipment. Bacillus spp. was found to be common with surface and airborne pathogen after CoNS. This is no surprise as Bacillus subtilis is evolving to be a persistent pathogen on inanimate objects.[24]

The antibiotic susceptibility profile of isolates from this study revealed that CoNS was significantly resistant to amoxicillin (73%), ampicillin-cloxacillin (80%), and cefuroxime (67%). CoNS can persistent as an important hospital and community pathogen. These bacteria have become a major concern to the medical community due to the fact that they have an extraordinary ability to adapt rapidly to antibiotic stress.[25] Because of the widespread use of penicillin in both communities and hospital, penicillin-resistant CoNS became rampant.

K. pneumonia e was also resistance to chloramphenicol, aminoglycosides, the penicillins, whereas E. coli showed resistance to some of the fluoroquinolones, particularly pefloxacin and ofloxacin. The first steps that contribute to the increasing incidence of these antibiotic resistant bacteria are the selection of resistant mutant strains from the patient's own flora during antibiotic treatment or the transfer between bacteria of mobile genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance.[26] Subsequently, resistant strains spread among patients and environments in hospital. It is believed that these infections originated from either patients, healthcare givers, and visitors or inefficient disinfection. The driving force of antibiotic resistance is the widespread use of antibacterial drugs that begins in the community.

Limitation of study

This study would have given better information with regard to direct effects of the bacteria isolated from the ICUs on ICU patients if patients admitted into these units were also screened for possible contraction of similar pathogens present before and after fumigation.


  Conclusion Top


The high level of bacterial contamination of equipment and inanimate objects in the ICUs and presence of multidrug resistant bacteria calls for prompt and holistic interventional measures because fumigation only minimized pathogen load in ICUs

Acknowledgment

We greatly appreciate Mrs. Habiba Jimeta Balla, Dr. Adamu Sadiq Abubakar, Dr. Kenneth Okon, and Abdulkarim Sahabi of UMTH, for their technical inputs and proofreading the final manuscript.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
World Health Organization. Health Care Associated Infections Fact Sheet; 2011.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Tutuncu EE, Gurbuz Y, Sencan I, Ozturk B, Senturk GC, Kilic AU. Device-associated infection rates and bacterial resistance in the intensive care units of a Turkish referral hospital. Saudi Med J 2011;32:489-94.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Leblebicioglu H, Rosenthal VD, Arikan OA, Ozgültekin A, Yalcin AN, Koksal I, et al. Device-associated hospital-acquired infection rates in Turkish intensive care units. Findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). J Hosp Infect 2007;65:251-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Byrns G, Fuller TP. The risks and benefits of chemical fumigation in the health care environment. J Occup Environ Hyg 2011;8:104-12.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Dancer SJ, White LF, Lamb J, Girvan EK, Robertson C. Measuring the effect of enhanced cleaning in a UK hospital: A prospective cross-over study. BMC Med 2009;7:28.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Zilberberg MD, Tillotson GS, McDonald C. Clostridium difficile infections among hospitalized children, United States, 1997-2006. Emerg Infect Dis 2010;16:604-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Wilcox MH, Fawley WN, Wigglesworth N, Parnell P, Verity P, Freeman J. Comparison of the effect of detergent versus hypochlorite cleaning on environmental contamination and incidence of Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect 2003;54:109-14.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
French GL, Otter JA, Shannon KP, Adams NM, Watling D, Parks MJ. Tackling contamination of the hospital environment by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): A comparison between conventional terminal cleaning and hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination. J Hosp Infect 2004;57:31-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.
Boyce JM, Havill NL, Otter JA, McDonald LC, Adams NM, Cooper T, et al. Impact of hydrogen peroxide vapor room decontamination on Clostridium difficile environmental contamination and transmission in a healthcare setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:723-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Andersen BM, Rasch M, Hochlin K, Jensen FH, Wismar P, Fredriksen JE. Decontamination of rooms, medical equipment and ambulances using an aerosol of hydrogen peroxide disinfectant. J Hosp Infect 2006;62:149-55.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.
Klevens RM, Edwards JR, Richards CL Jr., Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Pollock DA, et al. Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep 2007;122:160-6.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Cooper BS, Stone SP, Kibbler CC, Cookson BD, Roberts JA, Medley GF, et al. Isolation measures in the hospital management of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Systematic review of the literature. BMJ 2004;329:533.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA 1995;274:639-44.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C, Burchardi H, Martin C, Goodman S, Artigas A, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:108-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ikeh EI, Isamade ES. Bacterial flora of fomites in a Nigerian multidisciplinary intensive care unit. Lab Med 2011;42:411-3.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Okon KO, Osundi S, Dibal J, Ngbale T, Bello M, Akhuhwa RT, et al. Bacterial contamination of operating theatre and other specialized care unit in a tertiary hospital in Northeastern Nigeria. Afr J Microbiol 2012;6:3092-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Cowan ST. Cowan and Steel's Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria. 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge, UP; 1979. p. 238.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Lennette EH, Balows A, Hansler WJ. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 3rd ed. Washington, DC, Edinburgh, and London: ASM, Churchill Livingstone; 1980. p. 399-416.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Biemer JJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1973;3:135-40.  Back to cited text no. 19
[PUBMED]    
20.
Harbarth S, Rutschmann O, Sudre P, Pittet D. Impact of methicillin resistance on the outcome of patients with bacteremia caused by Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:182-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]    
21.
Jean-Baptiste N, Benjamin DK Jr., Cohen-Wolkowiez M, Fowler VG Jr., Laughon M, Clark RH, et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococcal infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:679-86.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Marchant EA, Boyce GK, Sadarangani M, Lavoie PM. Neonatal sepsis due to coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Dev Immunol 2013;2013:586076.  Back to cited text no. 22
[PUBMED]    
23.
Hassan AO, Hassan RO, Muhibi MA, Adebimpe WO. A survey of Enterobacteriaceae in hospital and community acquired infections among adults in a tertiary health institution in Southwestern Nigeria. Afr J Microbiol Res 2012;6:5162-7.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Kramer A, Schwebke I, Kampf G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 2006;6:130.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Livermore DM. Antibiotic resistance in staphylococci. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2000;16:S3-10.  Back to cited text no. 25
[PUBMED]    
26.
Livermore DM, Yuan M. Antibiotic resistance and production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases amongst Klebsiella spp. from intensive care units in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996;38:409-24.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed293    
    Printed8    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded64    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]